SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Help Desk Software Niche (RMDY, INFR, SWRT)
VNTV 77.60+2.6%Jan 12 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mike Buckley who wrote (72)6/27/1997 4:41:00 PM
From: Ron Kory   of 135
 
You said it was a good thing that SWRT is not covered by many
analysts because that makes it undiscovered. I must disagree; the
fact is that SWRT has two analysts that are willing to make estimates
on their earnings. I have to believe these are the two investment
firms that took the company public (I am guessing that Cowen and
Robbie stephens are the two). I think you have to take investment
bankers with a grain of salt regarding their objectivity. Yes, SWRT
is not widely followed (so far deservingly so) and if they do well
they will be discovered and followed by more analysts. Yet, lack of
analyst coverage is bad because the analysts hype a stock and get
the institutions to buy it. Stocks need sponsorship. Of course, if
you are an investor and are willing to wait that is one thing but this
group has some of the wildest swings in the entire equity market and
they are more for trading than investing (clearly my opinion).

CLFY is a little different. There are plenty of analysts covering the
stock with most in the "hold" mode at the moment because of the
recent slowing in CLFY's sales. However, if something good were to
happen there would be plenty of hyping from the analysts to institu-
tions to buy the stock (this is just an example--not an opinion that
CLFY is better than SWRT). Analysts help create the wide swings in
stocks by upgrading near tops and downgrading at bottoms. The best
and most recent examples are the downgrades in CSCO and COMS before
they started up at the end of April. There were numerous downgrades
in that period and as you probably know if you follow the group there
have been numerous examples of upgrades in the last month. What
changed?

I like to follow stocks that have at least four to five analysts.
Remember: if there are only two analysts they are more than likely
the I-bankers for the company and it is hard to take them seriously.
They HAVE to recommend a stock and they only downgrade it when it is
too embarrasing to maintain a buy recommendation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext