Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 45.51

+10.7%

Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (150311)	11/29/2001 11:08:02 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (2) of 186894

RE:"They did indeed. Do you think, perhaps, that if RDRAM had the industry support, that Rambus would have been able to come out with PC1066 before JEDEC released their DDR333 specs? I still think that RDRAM has the better technology. What you are seeing is a brand new DDR technology finally catch up to an RDRAM standard that has been out for a couple years already." What I see is the last nails driven in the casket of a scam. None the less, despite the fraud Rambus and Intel tried to pass on the industry, Intel seems to have escaped to DDR while Rambus is getting the axe. INtel. OTOH is about to unshackle from the Rabus debacle even more as they transition to DDR. Albiet single channel only. Meanwhile, I feel for all the ignorant who bought P4s and SDRAM and wonder if someone will start a class action. Jim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next