Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (12005)	11/29/2001 7:10:47 PM
From: MSI	Read Replies (2) of 281500

a minor correction, I don't believe MKULTRA was in operation until the 50s As far as a trial being a propaganda platform, openness is preferrable, imo. If the "evil doers" announce themselves in protest, so much the better. In any event a guilty verdict will send a salutory message, and blunt criticism, if it is a fair trial. A trial would also be good for suspicious minds, who wonder if a possible danger to the administration of a trial is that it would surface the extent of collaboration and initiatives by secret government agencies of the previous Bush group, and speculation whether the official President's Secrets Act recently mandated is covering up such agreements. source: "Body of Secrets" amazon.com We want to avoid this kind of suspicion, as documented in Bamford's book: "Even more worrisome is another revelation, from the Kennedy years: "The Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government. In the name of anticommunism, they proposed launching a secret and bloody war of terrorism against their own country in order to trick the American public into supporting an ill-conceived war they intended to launch against Cuba."

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next