SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 169.27-4.8%Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: engineer who wrote (16992)11/30/2001 9:37:12 PM
From: Eric L  Read Replies (2) of 197177
 
engineer,

<< In other words, if Qualcomm didn't give the Europeans their IPR for free, which was one of hte 5 items, then VOd would not play ball. Sounds pretty one way to me. Very glad that Q refused. >>

In other words is correct.

In other words, no.

IP, cross licensing, patent pooling were never mentioned in the conversation I referred to. Refusal to license was mentioned, however.

IP, btw, was not one of the 5 principles although it was referenced in the same whitepaper that Qualcomm published.

You might remember that VOD, along with DoCoMo was (still is) one of the key carrier drivers of the UMTS standard., if not the key carrier driver.

So reread the 5 principles (unless you have them memorized) and consider why Qualcomm's intransigent insistence on the majority of those 5 principles, on a single converged standard based on them, might have been anathema to VOD, and FT, and TIM, and BT, and ...

- Eric -
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext