Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dennis O'Bell who wrote (12465)	12/3/2001 3:45:58 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) of 281500

They are a big-time ecological problem in fact, when all the unpleasant side effects are factored in. It all depends on who you ask Dennis.. Uncontrolled torential floods that strip away topsoil and cause massive erosion, also create massive ecological problems. And it's usually as an effort to control such massive flooding that projects liket TVA, and Three Gorges in China, are launched. And for every person displaced by most hydro-projects, you'll probably find 1/2 dozen others who have jobs that did not exist before. But that said.. Dams built in the wrong place, and with poor designs, are a menace. This was clearly the case when dozens of dams burst in China, killing over 1/4 million people in the resulting floods. In places like the Amazon, the worst I see happening is the resevoir silting up and filling it in, which would then be consumed by the rain forest. And the dam would eventually be forced to open it's spillways dozens of years from now when (if?) this happens. But I'm with you. I would rather see new nuclear technology used, and more dependence upon fuel reprocessing/reenrichment, so less has to be buried. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next