SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 48.72+3.0%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (150983)12/4/2001 1:28:01 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Tenchusatsu,

I agree that in the interview, Via was trying to say that their products will still be needed, even though Hammer eliminates the most expensive and differentiating part of the chipset.

But I think you have a good point about the configuration of the low cost UMA chipsets. If the 2 choices are integrated memory controller + graphics, serving the CPU memory needs as well vs. Hammer processor with onboard memory controller serving memory to the graphics, given equal bandwidth, the 2nd solution should be faster, and cheaper, since memory controller silicon does not have to be duplicated on the chipset.

Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News