Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bilow who wrote (12744)	12/4/2001 8:50:07 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (3) of 281500

That's not the way that General Patton measured progress against the enemy. I was almost ready to post a similar reply when I read that. And it's especially pertinent when one considers that tactical and strategic blunders by the British command structure led to the war lasting into 1945, and claiming thousands of more lives needlessly. But I have to blame Eisenhower for that as well. Watched "A Bridge Too Far" the other day and it only reminded me of the almost criminal stupidity amongst British planners, particularly the failure to capture Caen on June 6th (when the Brit and Canadians had some of the best initial progress on D-Day), or the failure to close the Falaise Gap (while Patton was ordered to hold fast and let Montgomery close it). Then there was the failure to capture the Scheldt Estuary which would have opened up the port of Antwerp. These three boondoggles, all due to the notorious cautiousness of Montgomery (which he claimed was intended not to waste the precious lives of British soldiers). In the end, his incompetence led to the deaths of far more British and American soldiers that would have been necessary. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next