SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (94039)12/8/2001 1:49:48 PM
From: Night Writer  Read Replies (1) of 97611
 
El,
The history of this deal reflects both boards were informed and aware of the details from step one. At one point, a board stopped the process and then restarted the process. Hewlett is on the board of directors. So Hewlett supported the development and voted for the final deal. Shortly after that, he changed his mind and his vote.

From a human prospective, I suspect something close to the following happened.

The HP directors weren't sensitive to Hewlett's concerns during the development stages of this deal. They bull dozed his support and afterward someone got smart with him. Thinking back on it, Hewlett got angry. Now he is pulling the world down on top of those who were not sensitive and pushed him into the deal. If he wins the votes, those who ignored his concerns will leave. The replacements will know that Hewlett's concerns are important.
NW
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext