SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knighty Tin who wrote (93450)12/8/2001 2:43:13 PM
From: JHP  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
they better have billions and billions!<NG>
this states $130 million for THREE lawsuits!

<<The following is a restatement of the information in the two Form 8-K filings we made earlier this week.

December 4, 2001

Halliburton announced that on November 29, 2001, a Texas district court in Orange, Texas entered a judgment against its subsidiary, Dresser Industries, Inc., on a $65 million jury verdict rendered in September 2001 in favor of five plaintiffs following a trial of several weeks. Dresser believes that the trial court committed numerous errors, including the application of Alabama law and its evidentiary rulings during the trial. Additionally, the trial court denied Dresser the right to present evidence that the alleged illnesses of the plaintiffs were not caused by Dresser products, but instead could have been caused by the products of other companies which had previously settled with the plaintiffs. Dresser intends to appeal this judgement and believes that the trial evidence did not support the verdict and that its legal defenses will result in judgment on appeal in Dresser's favor.

The same district court also entered three additional judgments against Dresser in the aggregate amount of $35.7 million in favor of 100 other asbestos plaintiffs. These judgments related to an alleged breach of purported settlement agreements signed earlier this year by a New Orleans lawyer hired by Harbison-Walker Refractories Company, which had been defending Dresser pursuant to the agreement by which Harbison-Walker was spun-off by Dresser in 1992. These settlement agreements purportedly bind Harbison-Walker Refractories Company as the obligated party, not Dresser. Dresser intends to appeal these three judgements on the grounds that it was not a party to the settlement agreements and it did not authorize anyone to settle on its behalf. Dresser believes that these judgments are contrary to applicable law and that its appeal will be successful.

December 7, 2001

Halliburton announces that on December 5, 2001, a jury in Baltimore, Maryland returned verdicts against its subsidiary, Dresser Industries, Inc., and other defendants following a trial of several weeks involving asbestos claims. Each of five plaintiffs alleged exposure to Harbison-Walker Refractories products. Dresser's portion of the verdicts totals $30 million. Dresser believes that the trial court committed numerous errors, and that the trial evidence did not support the verdicts. Dresser intends to challenge the verdicts by post trial motion and, if those motions are not successful, to pursue an appeal aggressively.

Halliburton, founded in 1919, is the world's largest provider of products and services to the petroleum and energy industries. The company serves its customers with a broad range of products and services through its Energy Services Group and Engineering and Construction Group business segments. The company's World Wide Web site can be accessed at halliburton.com .>>
biz.yahoo.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext