SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (8387)12/8/2001 4:54:13 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (5) of 93284
 
You seemed to agree in an earlier post that 95% don't think independently. 95%, I would consider the masses. If you would like to give a different characterization for 95%, I don't mind.

2. And how is it that the British masses are so much more intelligent than their American brethren? These are the same clowns who made Britain "the sick man of Europe" until Margaret Thatcher slapped them up the side of the head, right?

All I've side on that point is that I've been impressed by the Brits that I've talked to. I didn't extend it to the entire population. You made a completely unsupported claim that every country represents the same 95% characterization of the US.

3. And I'm not saying Europeans and others have contributed nothing to science and technology; clearly they have made major, important contributions. But have you noticed these idiot Americans have been dominant for the last half century?

And I've told you earlier that I would like to see such information that would support that. I've asked you how you would measure it? With patents? With a global enterprise like Intel, that has design facilities in Taiwan; if an innovation was patented by Intel and the individual developing the patent was Taiwanise, is it a US innovation or a Taiwan innovation? You never responded to any of those questions.

You started a separate topic with nuclear weapons development and then proceeded to list foreign contributors to the development. You've mentioned the nebulous "economic innovations" and I've responded with a series of economic innovations used in the US that originated in other foreign countries. Did you respond? No.

I've provided information/statistics on various countries' health care systems where the life expectency and infant mortality rates are significantly better than the US. You've responded with the parroted phrase "socialized medicine".

Since I notice in an earlier post that your into IQ tests, here is an independent thinking test [I gave it to jla earlier, and he of course failed]

reagan.webteamone.com

The table on this site [or variations of it] has been used by many conservatives. It's basically the biggest snake oil scam of the century. The success it has achieved in the conservative base relies on the conservative base not understanding the simplest of facts on the Federal budget and an inability to think independently.

So what makes that table and it's conclusions a snake oil scam?

jttmab
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext