SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : AMAT Off-Topic Forum
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: willcousa who wrote (473)12/8/2001 5:15:20 PM
From: Mark Marcellus  Read Replies (1) of 786
 
You obviously misunderstood what I was referring to. I am speaking of the domestic changes to law enforcement rules. I worry that some of them are ill considered and may not stand up to constitutional scrutiny. I have no major problem with the foreign tribunals, and even if I did, the AG is not the one who would be conducting them. However, it would probably be a good idea to cross some t's and dot some i's on those as well, i.e. some sort of formal declaration by Congress that we are at war with those individuals, and developing procedures that are up to American standards. In the long run, we are much better off if the process is perceived as fair.

I am also, along with many others, puzzled as to why the AG was so reluctant to use government resources to look into the history of gun purchases of the domestic detainees. It does make it seem like their right to bear arms is more important to him than their freedom of speech, freedom of association, habeas corpus, etc.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News