Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (13256)	12/9/2001 6:33:06 AM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Whether it's a war, terrorism, crime or whatever seems a bit academic to me. The toughest guys win Mq exactly. someone once wrote... "The essence of war is violence. Moderation in war is imbecility." Louis Brandeis wrote... "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal...well-meaning, but without understanding." If it's a war, then Osama and Omar aren't terrorists they are leaders of a competing national power. Sure, they destroyed the WTC and lots of civilians it doesn't matter...O&O have operated outside of the accepted constraints. to achieve international status as a war participant and to get the protection afforded by that status, one must abide by the international war conventions. there is much precedent for trying not only war criminals but also spies and terrorists for actions in war zones. assuming capture... if they are terrorists, they will be tried for murdering 4,000 folks. if they are POWs, they will be tried for murdering 4,000 non-combatants. uw

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next