Z Best Place to Talk Stocks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Z Best Place to Talk Stocks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Larry S. who wrote (35616)	12/10/2001 12:06:33 PM
From: GREENLAW4-7	Read Replies (2) of 53068

FWC, from my research used asbestos in the manufacturing of STEAM BOILERS. The problem is that it was EXTENSIVE usage of the product and in various degrees. I believe they may have a problem just chapter 11 in one division and keeping the parent alone and safe. MDR had a similar problem as HAL and they just broke off the division and filed that under chapter11. Again MDR, and FWC are 85-100% liable parties to the act. Where HAL should be grouped as a 35% liable party if that, and also far removed from actual party that had DUTY to protect!! If you understand NEGLIGENCE, then its a lot easier to know why HAL's problem is NOTHING compared to USG, GRA, FMO, ACK, CCK, and MDR

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next