SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Cosmic Corner

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (558)12/10/2001 3:13:55 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) of 667
 
It is impossible to rationally tell people that their personal philosophies are not all equally valid- in a pluralistic society.

There are different categories of opinions. You mention personal philosophies, which are a component of the opinion landscape. If someone says that he thinks jogging is boring, he not only is entitled to that opinion, we can't say it's any less valid than any other opinion on jogging. If someone says, however, that they oppose the war because it will raise the price of avocados, which will then destroy the technology industry, I think we can safely say that opinion is not equally valid. To be valid, an opinion either needs to be so personal as to be of no consequence to anyone else or backed up by a reasonable rationale. IMO. People are entitled to even invalid opinions, but entitlement and validity are two different things.

Karen
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext