Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 169.27

-4.8%

Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eric L who wrote (17005)	12/11/2001 10:05:47 PM
From: Kayaker	Read Replies (1) of 197177

If you would like to perpetuate the myth that so far as 3GPP is concerned there is no valid reason other than a Q IP workaround for utilizing 5 MHz carrier, asynchronous as well as synchronous mode of operation, AMR, authentication with SIM, etc, etc., feel free to do so. Eric, I haven't heard back from you (#reply-16737675) so I thought I'd ask again.... At the recent analysts' meeting, Dr. IJ gave a detailed response (#reply-16692685) to questions regarding the 3-5 year delay of WCDMA vs CDMA2000 and numerous reasons why WCDMA will be lower in capacity as compared to CDMA2000 (note that he addressed both the 5 Mhz, and asynchronous vs synchronous issues). Given that these delays and capacity constraints will cost the European carriers multi billions of dollars, how do you explain their decision to reject CDMA2000 as anything other than an attempt to avoid Qualcomm IPR?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next