Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 43.48

+8.6%

Dec 2 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (152130)	12/11/2001 11:09:12 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Ten - Re: "Perhaps Krewell forgot that McKinley doesn't require off-chip cache like Merced, or that the die size isn't that much bigger than Cascades. (Well, actually it is, but when Cascades is approx. 370 mm2, another 50 mm2 or so isn't going to hurt. <G>) He of all people should know that die size means almost squat when you're talking about low volumes and high profit margins." You expect Krewell to give Intel an even break? Hah !! He's an ex-AMD employee - he'll damn Intel with faint praise at best. Paul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next