SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Austrian Economics, a lens on everyday reality
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LLCF who wrote (51)12/12/2001 1:29:26 AM
From: Don Lloyd  Read Replies (1) of 445
 
DAK -

ie. isnt' Warren saying that the 'analyst' has to count this as an expense one way or the other [assume constant dilutions with more stock every year in the spread sheet] or hold stock constant and lower the earnings projections???...

To the best of my knowledge, no one who has agitated for the expensing of employee stock options has ever given the slightest indication that they would be satisfied with treating the expense as the dilution that it actually is, or that they had even considered it as a possibility.

If accounting is supposed to audit the company, and not the shareholders, then the fact that the company is worth $98M with cash compensation and $100M with option compensation seems to me to be strong evidence that it is not reasonable to make a $2M compensation expense entry on the income statement in both cases.

Regards, Don
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News