SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 207.67+2.2%Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mani1 who started this subject12/13/2001 2:16:07 PM
From: andreas_wonischRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
First Northwood review online

It's from a 2.2 GHz Northwood overclocked to 2.66 GHz (133 MHz FSB). But it already allows some interesting comparisons & observations:

- the synthetical scores from Sandra are exactly 33% higher than a 2 GHz Willamette suggesting no major architectural changes (Sandra always scales linear with frequency on a given architecture) except twice the L2 cache

- SuperPi is with 67sec on par with an Athlon XP 1900+ (not overclocked); it's about 30% faster than a 2 GHz P4 suggesting good scaling with clock-speed (see www16.big.or.jp

- 3Dmark 2001 is only around 5% faster compared to a 2 GHz P4 (see sharkyextreme.com suggesting that this benchmark is more videocard limited

- CPumark '99 is more than 50% faster on the reviewed Northwood compared to a 1.8 GHz which is a little bit better than linear scaling (note that CPumark is also a synthetic benchmark which scores almost linear with frequency); it's probably roughly on par with a 1.6 GHz Athlon XP (see active-hardware.com

Overall it's hard to make conclusions based on the limited data and the obscure benchmarks. But it looks like that Northwood won't benefit that much over Willamette clock-for-clock.

Andreas
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext