SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : HWP -- Hewlett Packard
HPQ 20.37-1.2%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jerome who wrote (3842)12/14/2001 11:26:48 AM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Read Replies (2) of 4722
 
Ya know, and I'm just noodlin' here, but since your going to be on the Board, an' all, and since I used to teach this in law school, it might be worthy of comment that the Foundation is allowed its tax exempt status under 501(c)(3) because it maintains a PASSIVE role, as dictated by 4900 et. seq. of the Internal Revenue Code.

The origin of all this stuff is a case called Clay Brown in maybe 1968, where the Family tried to keep control of the Company and get a charitable deduction for the contribution of the company to the Foundation.

My thoughts are triggered by yours and Dave B's posts; And in light of the philosophy of the Statutory schema, if I were Walt, I might be less worried about a conflict of interest and more worried about the IRS revoking the tax free status of the Foundation.

Again I am just thinking outloud and nothing should be relied upon....or believed. :))
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext