Hey loser. Just post your May 15 holdings.
-------------- As I expected its all a game. Thought as much thats why I stuck around. That you have to resort to name calling like Stan is all the proof anyone will need. I'll play. Look at this--------
You have stated a number of times that you have owned ERF and PGF for a number of years. ERF on May 15 (2001) was 30.60; today it is 23.93 for a drop of 22%
------------ I'll address this one first. Look to my post # 46 and post # 57. The time of this posting is first quarter of 1998. Look to the table of unit values from post # 1998 from year 1998. The price of ERF was at $12. CHECK YOU OWN DATA SOURCES. The postings # 57 states that I have actively been accumulating on the weakness at that time. I bought a lot at the $12 area ( as documented there) what is the price of ERF today $23.93 That is a gain of just about 100%. So in my case where is the loss, where is the drop???????? ITS NO WHERE TO BE SEEN. The table from post # 1998 clearly shows the cycling of prices for the trust at the highends in the $30 area. When that cycle repeats to the high end. What will be my returns then for those I bought at $12????. You can then add to that the income generated each month --------- DOCUMENTED DOCUMENTED DOCUMENTED -----------
; PGF on May 15 was 21.55, today it is 13.17 for a drop of 39%!!!.
----------- You can look to the above posts #46 and # 57 again for confirmation that I was adding to this trust at that time. Consult your own data sources for unit pricing details. The price while accumulating PGF in 1998 was $10. What is the price of PGF today $13.17. Surprise thats a gain as well. And don't forget that income generated. And for an idea of the kind of income generated since its beginnings look to post # 1823 and to its price at its IPO which I got since I was in from the beginning. As stated in # 46. ----------------
You have stated in a previous post that you had bought NCF at 18, at 16, and at 14; today it is 11.60, for a drop of 27.5% (using 16 as your cost).
---------- This is the trust I have just started with in the last six months. you have missed one key purchase of mine with this trust $10.80 referenced from postings # 1570 # 1603 and # 1644. What has this done to my cost base. Particularly when I stagger my accumulating as when it drops buy much more again if it drops further buy much more still again, lowering the cost base with each successive and more units than the purchases before. My cost base becomes not $16 but much lower approaching $12. It is interesting to note that not too long after that the price of the units rose to $14.80. A prime example of the cycling in unit prices I have told of. At $14.80 then what was my loss. Surprise it was a gain. And add the income generated. The price has since fallen again but if it can cycle that quickly in that short period of time cycling on a longer time frame is equally possible and since I don't sell and will not realize a loss it will only turn into a future gain. ------------------------
All along you've been telling people these things are oversold - I refer to your post of June 28. For a genius like you that's a pretty shoddy performance.
------- Well lets see with all the above clearly documented facts we see pretty good performance after all. When one looks to the complete info. And the trusts are still oversold but the cycle will repeat itself it allways has and it allways will. And in the meantime I am laughing all the way to the bank -----------
------- Lets play some more. You can BS and I will show my documented past postings as proof ---------------------
------- Oh yeah so you don't pop a blood vessel in your head. From post # 46: ERF, PGF, REF And from further on in post # 46 EIF.UN, EIT.UN, NCD.UN, LUS.UN, LIF.UN, OPT.UN And remember I accumulate once I am in, on weakness. Next from post # 57 RTU, FND there are others but these got bought out or otherwise disappeared went private or other much like FND which became WFF then AE for now. And OPT.UN that got bought out. Next look to post # 393 which states how well the trusts have done since the earlier posts. Confirm at your leisure. Next look to post # 399 when I talk of my first foray into trading of the warrants. Next post # 729 talks of my success with the accumulating and the big turn arounds in LUS and WFF. Next Post # 748 shows LUS up to $4. Next post # 814 shows further confirmation of LUS WFF and the NCD.WT. -------- Now this takes you to about May of 2001 as you asked for. Remember it was you who asked for the specific postings. I have given all of that. NOW THATS DOCUMENTATION. I have reduced the number of postings for you to double check on. That you have to resort to name calling is just so pathetic. I expect much more of it as you begin to boil from the sheer extent of the documentation I can and will provide. As you won't be able to dispute or counter any of it. It will further make you boil. Your result will be not fact or evidence but name calling to try to win at this little exchange. Well as I have told Stan name calling doesn't win arguments name calling doesn't offer proof. -------
--------- SO LETS CONTINUE ON WITH YOUR GAME ---------------------- |
