SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 259.65+2.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: AK2004 who wrote (65855)12/17/2001 7:12:02 PM
From: fyodor_Read Replies (1) of 275872
 
Albert: that is pretty much equivalent to controlling standards, IMHO.

I disagree quite strongly ;-).

Take Microsoft as an example. Let's say the courts decided that MS had to give free and full access to the Windows standards and specifications, such that anyone could make a fully compatible product (not a clone, per say, since the competing OS could look and feel vastly different, and have different features integrated, various extensions etc).

That would effectively remove Microsoft's monopoly, providing someone actually made a decent, compatible product. Controlling the standards would still give MS an advantage, but it wouldn't be enough for them to hold on to their monopoly.

Take Intel&#133 Do you really consider them a monopoly? Or don't you consider them able to control the standards? (SSE, SSE2&#133)

If player a controls the standards and player b does not have free access to those then player b is not a viable alternative.

Controlling the standards does not mean that others do not have access to them. It might not be completely free, of course&#133

-fyo
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext