SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Three Amigos Stock Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sergio H who wrote (27615)12/17/2001 8:21:32 PM
From: Crossy  Read Replies (2) of 29382
 
Sergio,
as I see this insurance industry "banding together" is easy : NO WAY. MAXF booked it as a sort of "earnings replacement" because it was a BUSINESS INTERRUPTION type of isnurance. I thin it's quite logical to treat it this way. If there were a legal dispute going on the next 10-Q and 10-K should tell us more..

Additionally I would caution to appraise a company on a single quarter anomaly. The fact that this issue might end up in court should not have any impact on Maxcor's future revenue and earnings potential. In fact the 9/11 issues should really be preempted by the market by now. Uncertainty is omnipresent in the area of insurance. Both sides will enlist good attorneys, you can bank on this.

So my view here is: even if there might be a "problem" with this quarter's numbers (ex post facto) which I highly doubt - it won't affect Maxcor's future and to me that is what matters.

Market share calculations done in September are a tad odd to me because of the anomalies contained in them. I would rather listen to MAXF's upcomin conference calls and their next filings..

Finally Swiss firm CFT (Companie de Tradition) and some others might end up as potential suitors of MAXF.

rgrds
CROSSY
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext