I'm glad you posted that, Po, since I figured that when CH and Neocon realized the "just joking" defense wouldn't wash, the next step was for CH to claim he wasn't that IHub poster.
I knew it could be demonstrated that he was, but figured there would be a dance first. Thanks.
I think Quakers are Christians, btw. But I don't think Quakers have ministers. I went to two Quaker schools, and no ministers were in evidence at either of them. I suppose we might expect CH to claim next that each Quaker is the Minister of Him or Her Self?
In the post I quoted from, the word "ordained" doesn't appear, though it is clearly implied by "as a minister it's part of my job to pray for lost souls."
Maybe there are those on the planet who would think he meant something other than that? Strange things happen on SI. Like Neocon deciding that CH's evasions somehow didn't suggest that he'd actually said he was a minister.
I wonder if CH would now repeat this comment he made to me: "As to whether I am a Christian minister, that is, as you admit, completely your assumption. One made without any justification. I await your correction."
I think between us we've produced plenty of "justification," and I wonder who needs to do the correcting.
No, I haven't forgotten the appalling thing that happened to you here, nor did I fail to note the updated rat-ness. |
