Oh, I sent the complaint in, even used Robbin's 4 points quoted OSC section on N/L writers as my basic format, quoted 'em chapter and verse on places where I believe you have amply demonstrated falling short of the standard, shall we say? And yes, I even provided several SI threads--hyperlinked of course for their convenience...AND more. You see, I never go into these complaint "exercises" alone.
I supported my egregious behavior complaint posit with a character witness who is unashamed to be associated with me and my filing of same ...
Who is he? Well, let's just call him a highly regarded individual within Canadian regulatory circles. Yes, the gent has made a career out of pursuing compliance and regulatory excellence in Canadian mining equity listings, and is a duly licensed broker on both sides of the 49th Parallel.
No, sorry, it isn't Zardoz...a person who's residency is unknown by me at this time.
If you escape with your rat-pack P&D modality intact, I'd be willing to wager it will only be because a bigger fish "scandal" distracts the TSE investigators.
I don't bluff, Claude. I actually enjoy helping securities regulators clean house...I never go into these matters unadvisedly. A level playing field is what all speculators and investors want. Funny, so do the regulators for the most part, in the equity sector.
I still give Wayne Agee's particularly fine display of puffery, for helping me to know it was time to pull the trigger and proceed.
Now, back to your recent demands:
1: Demand one...that I discuss TA with you.
Name me ONE good reason why I should complete yours and Marco's education in that regard? If you can't spot the largest missing corroborating piece to your own argument, I see no incentive to provide it on a silver head tray.
2: Demand two:: "Now do you want to explain why you think that BAY exploration results are "flimsy" and not supportive of a strong silver project with great economics."
I've explained that one regarding BAY.TO in particular until I'm blue in the face, and don't see any reason to believe you are willing to listen now, primarily to save your own ass. Since you've never turned a shovel nor outfitted a mine, you wouldn't know, hands on 'great economics' up close and personal if it splatted on your face.
You'll have to experience a paradigm shift---you know, one of those analytical processes where, to get different answers, you have to ask a different set of questions? All I see is intrenched, programmed subjective thought ruts. Must be why you can't see the problems nor respond correctly in my opinion.
So, go chase your tail, rat pack
---there are about 6 of you on first glance, in your P&D corner of the baywatching world.
Justice may grind slowly, but it will grind fine. Thank goodness there are post Bre-X regulators who care.
Merry Christmas, Claude, you 6 have got a lot to think about and to review during the holiday season. Sincerely doubt any of you will make the time to do so, however.
Now, since I've initiated the TSE complaint process, it is rather useless for me to continue to post on this BAY.TO thread wouldn't you agree? So, continue to carry on, as usual, in public or private, without regard for the OSC standards in just this one instance, okay? I've already showed Russ Winter his being set-up when he lied about me last weekend.
But, lurk? Oh, yeah, I'll be lurking, and with an agenda.
Cherrio. |
