Gustave is peddling a theory about current events, as the facts are not all on the table. In contrast, you are still spouting decades-old Israeli propaganda which has been utterly refuted. Take for example the 1948 Israeli actions in driving out the Palestinians, where you cite an Economist article which directly opposed all other evidence.
Message 16328249
Message 16328125
Message 16584321
Reading Christopher Hitchens' article "Broadcasts" in the book "Blaming the Victims", I find that even this last flimsy piece of evidence of yours is a fraud. Dr. Childers researched this article, and found that the report had been written from Cyprus by a correspondence who used an uncorraborated Israeli source. So, yes, to use your words, The Economist was indeed a Zionist agent! And that is the most fascinating thing about all this - your choice of words:
So in your opinion the British District Police Commisioner and the Economist are Zionist agents
and
But that would not explain the contemporary reports of Arab orders in the Economist, hardly a fan of the Zionist cause.
Compare that with Jon Kimche, who tried to debate Dr. Childers' research and lost:
Look at this Economist report. You will surely not suggest The Economist is a Zionist journal?
It appears to me you are simply reading off AIPAC pamphlets, as I had suspected all along.
Tom |
