SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 168.060.0%Dec 1 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: oconnellc who wrote (109903)12/26/2001 10:13:16 PM
From: saukriver  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
OT: rights of non-citizens

I didn't quite understand your post insinuating that marginmike had not read the Constitution. You also posted a link to the Constitution, perhaps to slam marginmike.

I went back and read marginmike's post to which you were replying. He said that basically he did not grok why non-citzens have any Constitutional rights. Then, you cranked up on him with your post.

What part of the Constitution says that non-citizens have rights? The SC cases have not (in the first 212 years here) extended Constitutional safeguards to non-citizens. (In fact, in Korematsu, they justified the taking of liberty away from U.S. citizens.)

Plattitudes like "Rule of Law" don't explain either the law or how you think it is applied. Please explain your position that rights of non-citizens are somehow rooted in the Constitution.

saukriver
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext