Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Phil Jones who wrote (14448)	12/27/2001 12:24:23 PM
From: Bill Jackson	of 14627

Phil, The listing requirements are a lot stiffer than those required to maintain a listing. Since mining companies go waaay and and down if the TSE struck off every mining company in a down phase they would probably soon get rid of many of their junior mining companies. I believe that they wish to keep a good mixture and will permit a mining or exploration company some latitude in maintaining their listing for quite a while as long as the file properly and keep some cash on hand. for example, look a ME and SAS on the TSE, worth a whole lot less, and still there. So PFG is safe for a few years, at least. Bill

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next