SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : January Effect 2002

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RockyBalboa who wrote (58)12/28/2001 4:06:42 PM
From: Q.  Read Replies (2) of 91
 
Here are my 23 final picks for January Effect 2002:

I divide them in three categories, according to the quality of the company:

Low quality, but unlikely to go BK in the next 12 months:
EAG KPT CTT NCEH SNDT VLCT NEXM

Very low quality, might fail in next 12 months:
STHK DCH HEC IRSN MLRC ATMS UFAB VRTL MFNX CIO

POS, might go BK anytime:
LSATA.ob SBAS MCLD IMDS.ob ISCO.ob OPWR.ob

Here are 12-month charts:
finance.yahoo.com

I've linked a public portfolio of these picks to the opening message of this thread. I used my actual average price of the stock, but I don't include commissions, which will amount to roughly 1% of the investment, round-trip.

I bought all the stocks today, the next-to-last day of the trading year. Re. timing: if I had bought them yesterday I would have gotten better prices, and indeed I got better prices during the day than the closing price, because the port is up 4% for the day.

For the purposes of making the table easy to read, I've artificially assumed that I bought exactly $1000 of each stock, although I actually bought in different amounts, and I allocated more to the highest-quality issues and less to the POS issues.

In comparison to previous years, my picks differ this year because I include cheaper stocks (>$0.35) and I didn't use value criteria, except that I usually required a positive shareholders equity. Consequently, my picks are lower-quality companies than previous years, which is a change I made because I saw how Midland's picks outperformed mine last year. I chose a larger number of issues in order to diversify and reduce the risk.

My picks all have low 12-month RS and low institutional ownership. Many of them have declined in the last few weeks on higher-than-average volume, which is a characteristic of tax-loss-selling.

Good luck all!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext