SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega - A Civil Discussion
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eve Edelson who wrote (1790)6/30/1997 9:27:00 PM
From: Francis Muir   of 1908
 
*** Reverse Splits ***

I believe i started the thread and it has been interesting. No, obviously IOM won't reverse split, but if they had had had the last 2:1 (?) split, they would now be a much better looking 39+. Under 20 does look a little forlorn and not to be taken too seriously. If Iomega has been bale to ramp up production then I am expecting a good quarter, if not, then they should at least meet expectations, which would drive the price into the ground.

FIDO

Postscript. It may have looked as tho' I reposted twice today, but it seems to be a glitch with the SI software and they are looking into it. That reminds me, is SI publicly traded?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News