2 points in your post:
1: If it was ok for Clinton, it is ok for W.
Yeah, you got a problem with that?
2: McAuliffe doesn't lobby.
Maybe not, but that isn't the only possible conflict of interest. For instance, Maybe the people he lobbies for, like the PRC, are not on record as his official benefactors.
Novak is ok, and I am sure he is trying to score brownie points with his good buds on Capital Gang. I will keep my eyes open for more information on this topic. I do not have a knee jerk reaction that says of W bad, Novak good, or vice verse.
But, I would ask that you keep me updated on this, but you won't even share your work on what three keywords I used that alarmed you. So, if I see something I like on the subject, I will post it to you. |
