(OT)Now that I have checked into it, OJ was in fact tried three times.
Re A jury found OJ didit. Another jury decided he hadn't been totally proven guilty beyond any reasonable doubt. That doesn't mean he didn't do it.
(1)Well there is the original trial. Result innocent.
law.umkc.edu
(2)Then there was the civil case. Much easier to prove someone "guilty". Effective result...innocent.
cnn.com
Both victims' families sued him in civil court and won judgments of $33.5 million in damages in 1997 from a jury that held him liable under a different standard of proof. That verdict is still on appeal. Living well on a pension..Afterward, Simpson successfully challenged paying the award and lives well today on a hefty pension plan. He draws $25,000 a month on the $4 million pension set up when the former pro football star, actor and ad pitchman was making millions.
(3) Custody of Children. Effective result innocent.
usatoday.com
Judge Nancy Wieben Stock found the Browns, who had battled Simpson for custody, failed to show Simpson "would be clearly detrimental to their well-being." Rather, the judge suggested, the children could flourish with Simpson.
Then there are some "open questions" about some of the evidence submitted.
news.bbc.co.uk
Mind you the World reknown expert in the link is Chinese. The race of other experts mentioned isn't defined, but they could be biased too. Here are some of the additional "liers"
usatoday.com
Three people who will testify that the Bronco was broken into at the tow yard: tow truck driver John Meraz, Detective Kelly Muldorfer and William Blasini, a car parts buyer who said he didn't see any blood when he sat in the truck while it was in the tow yard; the defense contends that evidence from the Bronco can't be trusted. [Wot no red blood visible in a white truck jeez, can't have been looking properly -lol-]
So has OJ been tried enough times yet, even for a blackman, on his wife's murder or is he still "guilty"? |
