SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : AMAT Off-Topic Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gottfried who wrote (554)1/2/2002 1:09:50 PM
From: Dale Knipschield   of 786
 
Gottffried,
>I don't do that kind of thing because it never
ends and becomes a time sink.<

You're right aboutr that.. Also, I've been thinking over what I know about the incident and two separate crash sites could make sense.

I remember a TV interview with a woman who lived near the crash site. She said that when the plane came over her place just before it crashed, it was upside down. These planes aren't stressed to do aerobatics, and with the passengers and hijackers wrestling for control, the press reported that there were a lot of rapid changes in altitude, direction, etc. going on. Since these engines are designed to shear off relatively easily, these maneuvers could have taken an engine off, then put the plane completely out of control, then upside down, especially with an inexperienced pilot at the controls. Makes sense to me.....end of my conspiracy theory.

Regards,

Knip
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext