SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill Fischofer who wrote (9179)1/3/2002 10:54:17 PM
From: James Calladine  Read Replies (1) of 28931
 
SEPARATION FROM GOD:

If I might chime in, Adi Da tries to make it totally clear that EVERYTHING and EVERYONE arises in God and there is therefore no separation, ever.

He speaks of the ego as an activity of CONTRACTION of that which is living it (God), resulting in the sense of separation.

It is a conceit of the ego to imagine itself AS God while it is contracting against the very energy that lives it. However, egos have no sense whatever of their vanity, stupidity or illusion. The ego's conceptions of God are profoundly unreal, because they are based on the notion of separation + the fantasy of power, wisdom and greatness added on top of this fragile base.

All of us on this thread, as far as I can see, are egos,
and we may think we have the right concepts that make sense to us, but all of us, in some way or another are less than respectful of the differing points of view around us.

Why? The are arising in God also!

Namaste!

Jim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext