Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SirRealist who wrote (15729)	1/7/2002 9:15:18 AM
From: joseph krinsky	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Hi SR- I kind of agree with the 2 year service issue. While it does have a taste of the sour, there are a lot of benefits that a young person would receive from his/her stint. They would be exposed to many different people and they way they live, they would get to leave the nest but still be under some sort of controlled system, they would get to see different parts of the country/world, they would be able (I assume after service benefits like the veterans get would be available, after all they could be considered to have "earned" them) to do things that maybe they couldn't afford without the service, IMO there's a lot to be said for universal service. I think they would benefit themselves just as much as the country would benefit.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next