SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: gao seng who wrote (215572)1/7/2002 5:48:37 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
NATO cannot replace the UN, but it can be the more important multi- lateral institution, as a sort of club of developed nations (with a few exceptions).

If there are no reasons to belong at some future time, then we won't.

There is no reason for the UN to replace NATO, they are not interchangeable.

As far as the EU goes, I would doubt that they would become a military threat, but I am not as sure economically. There if still a lot of protectionist sentiment in Europe. It would be preferable if there were continued liberalization of world trade, and the EU could thwart that, by building a wall around its own customs union. This could harm relations between the US and the EU, because although protectionism helps our consumers, it hurts our producers, and people tend to focus on that......
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News