SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.16-0.5%9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: semiconeng who wrote (154281)1/8/2002 1:23:10 PM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (3) of 186894
 
Re: overclockers getting near

.18 P4 pretty consistently OC'd to 2.2GHZ in air, while .18 Athlon was consistent to 1.8GHZ.

There was a report of a 2.6GHZ P4 in air and a 2.4GHZ AThlon with air that I've seen, but neither was typical, and I'm suspicious of both reports.

.13 P4 is too young for a pattern to emerge, but seems to be OK, at minimum, for a 14% overclock (to 2.5GHZ), and I recall one report from Asia suggested 2.9GHZ with air and 3GHZ with LN2 - which didn't make much sense, LN2 should have provided more of a gain than that, but it may have been FSB limited. Since most other overclocks indicate around 2.5GHZ with air, that overclock from Asia may have been all LN2 and was mistranslated.

We'll have to see how .13 Athlon does, very few Athlons have gone above 2.2GHZ, even on LN2. But very few .18 P4's did, either.

So far, Intel is 3 days ahead of AMD in getting to .13 with a high end chip. We'll so how far they are able to stretch that lead. Weeks? Months?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext