VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Clappy who wrote (46145)	1/10/2002 5:05:27 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) of 65232

"I think he was just joking." Where was polvie's <ggg> then? Sorry clappy, but even in jest, which I sincerely doubt, it crossed the line IMO. Cruel & insensitive humor is still cruel & insensitive. I guess that a few weeks ago, on Polvie's NNBM thread, bin_Laden_in_Austin's vile & repulsive comments about RR & I (which, among other things, attributed to me cruel & insensitive comments that innocent Arab American's should be shot) weren't repulsive enough to warrant an equally insensitive response to bia???????? Seems like jokes of the kind JW got are selectively passed out, 'eh? Me thinks polvie didn't like JW's comments & wanted to make a point. His silence on bia's repetitive & equally repulsive comments toward RR & I speak volumes. My point is that he seems to be selective in his use of cruel & insensitive rebuttals when others make very similar (or even more frequent use of vile & repulsive) comments. BTW, it did fog up my glasses. So far, it seems I have good reason for it. Ö¿Ö

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next