SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 256.89-1.2%Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: StanX Long who wrote (58711)1/11/2002 8:41:35 AM
From: Gofer  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
Stan, a snip from Fleckenstein's column of interest to AMAT holders.

Found here (a fee site, registration required) grantsinvestor.com

Sleight Of Golden Handshake Now for comments by a reader in the tech trenches: "My mom was a director at AMAT's personnel department in Santa Clara, California. She told me AMAT was paying people to leave and keep quiet when they were announcing 'no layoffs.' Shortly thereafter, AMAT started whacking large chunks of their payroll. She stated that this was a common practice in tech land, and what the execs were saying for public consumption was not what was being done within the corporation. [This has been a long-running "open secret."] When I asked her about the same practice at CSCO, she said that she could not fathom how that is not happening, given what the rest of the industry is doing. In the interest of full disclosure, she was part of the December layoffs, where Human Resources really got whacked. You need HR people to rehire for the impending boom in the business, although if there is no boom, there is no need for HR people to service all the new or returning employees. She got a monster severance and a new job at [XYZ institution's] HR department, where she will make more in salary than at AMAT. She was at AMAT for the options. At 91, and 55, and 46, they did not do very well."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext