Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: charred who wrote (14495)	1/11/2002 8:37:28 PM
From: Elizabeth Andrews	Read Replies (1) of 14627

I doubt that Lowell is in the picture other than as a consultant. Who did what and who actually was responsible for the Arequipa discovery is a little foggy for me. The point of the merger, as I've been trying to say, is that it's a homecoming, a merger of people who know each other and my view is that the shareholders of the combined company are better off having this group together rather than separate. That's it. There's no test for anyone to pass. Shrake is accepted into this group as a very good explorationist. That may or may not be the case but he has a worse record as a CEO. The roles in both companies are being shuffled and I think it is a better bet now. PFG fills a weakness that existed in DAY and PFG gets an honorable exit path with some upside. It's my view and it may be wrong. We'll see. By the way, thanks for all your input to the various companies we see seem to both follow on the path to riches. It has helped me.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next