SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (9427)1/16/2002 12:03:05 PM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (2) of 28931
 
Hi X
I thought I was on ignore? No mind, how are you?
If the "terms" as you put it, were not already established prior to the argument, then you would have a point. As it stands however, the terms were laid out thousands of years ago in the bible. How do I know God is not an effect? The answer is because He explicitly claims not to be, and as I said, He did so prior to any arguments to the contrary. So it's not really defining terms after the fact, now is it? No, in fact Only one God fits the facts about the universe as we know it to be. Only the God of the bible is a personal, self existent, un-created Creator, who dwells outside of space-time limitations. Not only does the existence of this God provide an adequate and logically necessary explanation for the physical universe, but also provides a basis for absolute morality as well. You, on the other hand, as far as I can tell, have adequate explanation for neither.

Now back to class.
Have a good day
Greg
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext