Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 48.76

-1.0%

10:26 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (155696)	1/16/2002 4:53:16 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) of 186894

wbmw, I forgot about that slide. 3400+ in Q4 would be good, but I don't think it is written in stone (neither Q4, nor 3400). However, I don't think Barton will get as high as 2.5GHz (or even 2.3GHz, for that matter). That's why I called them "hypothetical". I think that they will be very far between. Hammer doesn't even have a Microsoft OS at launch. Neither did (or should I say does) Itanium. I am not too oprimistic about Windows support for any 64bit CPU prior to the next major revision (not XP servers, one after that). However, a sufficient 64 bit Windows support for hammer is a fraction of the effort needed for Itanium, and this fraction is even smaller because MSFT can leverage a lot that has been done for Itanium. All Hammer needs performance critical parts such as memory management, parts of I/O. Everything else can run in 32bit mode. But even though the effort needed for Windoes x86-64 is very modest I have my doubts whether it will happen. Joe

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next