SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 307.20+2.0%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: michael97123 who wrote (58899)1/17/2002 9:50:02 AM
From: Katherine Derbyshire  Read Replies (2) of 70976
 
As a rule of thumb, most industry experts believe that "reasonable" capex levels are about 11% of semiconductor sales. Less than that creates a serious risk that companies will fall behind their competitors and behind long term IC demand. More than that creates a serious risk of a capacity glut, with all the problems it brings.

In 2000, industrywide capex was about 15% of semiconductor sales, with some individual manufacturers investing 100% or more of their sales in new equipment. In 2001, capex was still around 14% of sales. There's still a lot of idle chipmaking capacity out there, particularly in the foundry and DRAM spaces. Until there's a sustained recovery in IC *prices*, I wouldn't expect to see much growth in capex.

Now, there's also the technological obsolescence question: at what point does existing capacity have to be replaced because it's either uneconomical or can't deliver high performance. But I think that's only a strong consideration in segments with reasonable sales and profit margins. If I were one of Hynix's creditors, for example, I wouldn't be looking to loan them *more* money on top of the $6 billion they've already defaulted on.

Katherine
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext