SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tradelite who wrote (144651)1/18/2002 1:23:59 PM
From: benwood  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
If Early is correct in that all 22 changes worked to lower the CPI, the random odds of going 22 for 22 would be 1 in 4,194,304.

I believe all administrations would prefer to maximize taxes & minimize payouts via the CPI (give that they are using existing laws), so I don't see a change in administrations as changing that bias. Sure, GW wants to lower taxes, but not that way. If he truly wants to lower taxes, he wants credit for it, and he wants it to go to those who will got him elected. Ditto Clinton, ditto Sr.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News