SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Philosopher who wrote (2381)1/18/2002 3:04:36 PM
From: Matt Brown  Read Replies (2) of 12465
 
>>Matt over on IH said he would just crumple up such a subpoena and do a Michael Jordan into the nearest trash can with it. But he doesn't realize, perhaps, that failure to comply with a subpoena can subject you to legal liability.<<

Correct. But later on in the next few messages, you point out *exactly* my stance on the issue.

>>But as a business, SI needs to balance the costs and benefits of that path with the costs and benefits of complying with the subpoena.<<

My call would be, I'd rather deal with the legal liability, if it even existed. You have to think like a business person and not a robot. If you comply with THAT subpoena, you surely don't have to worry about the legal aspects anymore. Yes that is true. But on the flip side, you will no longer have a business to run, either, due to the instant mass exodus.

SI complies with that subpoena, this site is over with. Nobody will sign up for a membership. If they don't comply, they *MIGHT* get dragged into court. I'd say "Bring it on" so I could prove how the subpoena is complete BS. At least then, you have fought the good fight, made your move as a business person, and showed you stood for what was right.

MB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext