SI responds to a court ordered subpoena, they have no choice.
If you disagree it is up to you to object to the turnover of the information.
SI has absolutely no duty to pay for your defense.
The purpose of discovery is to find issues. Normally the requestor does not have to say why or what he is looking for.
You want to stop Dobry, you think he is a nut case? Find an attorney who thinks you have a case who will sue him for abuse of process, or wait for a victory and sue him for malicious prosecution, or if you think he is crazy, have him classed as a vexatious litigant, or just try to have him committed to an institution.
Oh, and the next time you hear the poison that is spread by large insurance interests or big business or politicians or the stock brokerage houses about attorneys, don't be so quick to chime in, as the Kingston Trio once said, in the song, Coplas, "Do not muddy the water around you, you may have to drink it soon".
And furthermore, you want to know what is REALLY funny, Gary may be a part of 10,000 people on these threads who may have been pumping stocks in a manner that required a brokers license, and the sec/nasd/uso did nothing, and yet that may have been one of the major causes of the dot com bubble and burst, which may have severly damaged out country. And the only person that HAD a license who could legally and by training give advice on stocks was kicked off.
Go figure. |
