Interesting, 'jlallen,' that you always must resort ...
... to diminishing other people by gender ... when all else fails.
'Going for the crotch.' -g- You do this in the courtroom, 'Counselor?' I've love to see it ... LMAO.
'Homos' (although as I recall you use much more 'pedestrian' -- rather, 'non-elitist' phraseology -g- --
'I'll 'shame them' into SILENCE based on lurid references to 'getting any,' posts 'jlallen.'
As if you actually believe that saying -- IN FRONT OF OTHERS -g- -- that 'bonnuss_in_austin' is 'too ugly' to be, what, 'given your permission? to have sexual relations? ... which makes her not only 'undersirable' to 'men,' but completely 'useless' in any 'way.'
Here's a man who, first of all, has no idea of the gender of the Cyberspace alias, 'bonnuss_in_austin.'
Secondly, 'jlallen' has no idea if the alias 'bonnuss_in_austin' has -- LMAO -- sorry; it's just too hilarious -- had sex in the past 15 minutes, 24 hours or 25 years -- and, <HA!> FURTHERMORE ...
He has no idea what KIND of sex the alias, 'bonnuss_in_austin' engages in, if any ... F*k! It could be something KINKY!!! It could be with a spouse ... or the construction crew bisexual swinger remodeling the next-door neighbor's bathroom ... or with half the married members of the Baptist church two blocks away ... or ...
LOL. Need I further elaborate?
What you are doing in the post to which I respond, 'jlallen,' implies that women who don't 'defend themselves' on an investing message board site by 'asserting' something along the lines of, "Oh NO, 'jlallan!' I have sex!!! I like men!!!" ... have no right to post on SI.
And especially, on boards that 'jlallen' likes to believe he 'controls.'
Hey, 'jla:'
GFY ... many more times than once ... in as many positions as you can imagine.
Given your posting history, I doubt that you're very creative...i.e. 'Me on top. Ugh. I win.'
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
bia |
