SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (141957)1/20/2002 11:32:53 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1585449
 
Well, just about every other one of his 'prizes' was for a military spending blunder.

The $600 hammers are cost accounting anomalies that have nothing to do with the real cost of hammers -- to the military or anyone else. Had the government paid $12 for the hammers, the other $588 would have had to have been paid elsewhere. This is just one of those issues where it is too damned complicated to explain to America in a soundbite, and unfortunately, it becomes the subject of political debate when it shouldn't.


Let me see........a $12 hammer cost $600. Yeah, your right....it looks way too complicated for anyone to understand. Spin, spin, spin........that's the name of the game.

the threat to our well being he kept saying it was in public

This is typical liberal revisionism. Reagan, almost single handedly, brought eliminated nuclear proliferation, ended the Cold War, and brought down the Russian military. This is what strength in political leadership is all about.


Reagan did squat...except spend money and build up the deficit. Russia collapsed of its own inert weight. Any other explanation is Reps. revisionism.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext