SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Gary Dobry Subpoenas 41 SI Aliases
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cage Rattler who wrote (187)1/21/2002 9:14:42 AM
From: scion  Read Replies (2) of 1136
 
From my layman's point of view, I'd say malicious prosecution by subpoenas demanding information on people who are not not named or involved in the Marchese v Dobry lawsuit.

If Dobry is allowed to harass people, using a compliant lawyer who checks nothing his client tells him, then the system is failing to protect the privacy of citizens.

If a congenital liar such as Dobry is allowed to make insane accusations without any evidence, and the subpoena system is used as a bludgeon to obtain the identities of people on his "enemies list" then it is wrong and harmful.

In this case, there is written evidence of perjury by Dobry in an affidavit, and sanctions were called for under Rule 11 of Dobry's attorney, Richter. Although these were denied, it is clear that Richter has accepted what Dobry tells him without hesitation and without even the most rudimentary checks to support subpoenas.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News