SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 459.87+0.7%Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill Fischofer who wrote (64319)1/21/2002 11:51:10 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
"Windows will never be as good a timesharing system as Unix because there is no reason for it to develop such capabilities. Hardware is still riding Moore's law and processors continue to get ever cheaper and more plentiful. In such an environment to focus on a timesharing model would be a poor business decision on MSFT's part."

Your analogy with cellular phones is wrong, and above you
are expressing the "One user"/"One CPU"/"One task" MSDOS
mentality. And your understanding of "timesharing"
is incorrect too.
In the 21-century personal CPUs can do
much more work than sitting and waiting for you
to press a key on your keyboard, or waiting for a
synchro pulse to format a floppy. There are plenty
of resources to share - printers, scanners, CD burners,
MP3/DVD playbacks, home automation/security, storage
maintenance, websurfing. Proper timesharing is the
only reasonable way to share resources and sustain
data streams. Windows seem
to be catching with this, but too slowly and awkwardly.

"Windows has its roots in the networked PC world"
You must be joking. Windows has its inexcavable
roots in DOS.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext