SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter W. Panchyshyn who wrote (2484)1/22/2002 4:23:51 PM
From: gg cox  Read Replies (1) of 11633
 
No need for the lecture at the end of your post,or that certain edge that you show that seems to piss a lot of people off here.I don't think i was giving you attitude,You state here that the high for ncf for 2000 was 18.15

"year ----- high ---- low ----- split adjusted
2000 ----- 18.15 ----- 10.68 ------"

I know the high was $21.15 because that is what i received ($7.05 times time 3) before the reverse split.

I know that the price today for one share is around $12.00 that is a difference of $9.15

This is just an example but I know eight months after this reverse split, if i hadn't sold I would be under water including sardines.Even considering averaging down it would take a long time to get the $9.15 back.(just for you <grin> that $9.15 went into acclaim the other day)
row row row your boat...lalalala
We slithering peon's make the market so that you can carry out your plan.. a point you disagree with BUT ..it's true!
gg
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext